For once abandoned my method of abstract discussion to put myself in current, as now, but loving us just think the essential, I find myself compelled us, also because every blessed day I have to listen to the news updates of Villa San Martino, which more than honest criticism from moralists seem to me gossip powerless and frustrated, the whole thing makes me leap to mind ideas from different points of view: 1. What are the vices of the Prime Minister, I could not care less. As a citizen I ask only to be ruled, which is already struggling to catch a glimpse and leaves me quite upset (Euphemism). As they spend free time in this or that, in an era of widespread moral dissolution (where every action and correction would be equally as good from the evil eye of the public, accustomed to a confused idea of \u200b\u200b" freedom "), I do not think. However, to each his criticism.
2. I'll definitely lost some connection (perhaps even because you think just how the whole thing is playing, what matters is that it is), but I am surprised that the Prime Minister in the monitoring (intercepted) 24/24h 365 days' year. Now, there are also legal grounds, we want to believe; ma l’uso disinvolto di tali strumenti da parte della magistratura un tantino mi preoccupa, anche perché temo di ricordare cose simili in letture tipo “1984”. Ad un certo punto c’è da augurarsi che se questi magistrati abbiano dispiegato mezzi in modo così massiccio, riescano ad arrivare al risultato da loro paventato, altrimenti ci rimediano una gran bella figura da cioccolatai. Debbo dire, però, considerando la capacità della nostra classe magistratuale a portare a buon fine i casi, che c’è poco da sperare. 3. Se il segreto istruttorio doveva essere superato nel 1989 per lasciare spazio a sputtanamenti molto spesso privi di rilievo penale, giusto per il gusto di gettare marciume su qualcuno (Chairman of the Board or any citizen that is), congratulations for the brilliant gift for jackals.
4. It 's the most interesting point on which I dwell. I wonder more and more, day after day, as do so many people to survive mentally, politically, to have topics of discussion when Berlusconi, as well as their hope, there will be more. That's why I titled the article "Paron collective" because that is what I get.
Let me be clear: I am not his lawyer or his fans, to defend him, nor I do not like what his (un) social-economic-political idea advocates in society. Berlusconi a media phenomenon, one need only turn off the television, not enough about him to "cancel" to talk, even evil, to him, he decreed the success would be enough to understand it, but it seems quite a compelling talk and think. They accuse him of having done expire in 30 years the customs of the Italians, then not quite understand why the same Italians turn on the television on "Big Brother" to get the affairs of others, or understand what they did in the Berlusconi government not to establish a costume result, since in the name of democracy everyone should be free.
E 'in power thanks to the monopoly of information is said, so the information is not free. E’ talmente illiberale che i suoi denigratori pubblicano pseudo-opere presso la sua casa editrice perché paga meglio.
E’ un’offesa alle donne, e chissene che “Sex and the city” è un fenomeno planetario e un modello di donna emancipata.
Il successo personale e politico di Berlusconi si può riassumere da una parte nel fatto che ha “saputo” tradurre problemi squisitamente personali in questioni collettive (giustizia in primis; se da una parte le sue magagne le devono giudicare i giudici, non il sottoscritto così come altri scribacchini e parolai, dall’altra è innegabile l’inefficienza e la megalomania della classe magistratuale. Basta vedere quanti casi di cronaca non vengono risolti, quanti anni pendono le cause col rischio che cadano in prescrizione, ma gira e rigira la colpa la danno sempre della politica; lo è nella misura in cui non scoraggia in modo efficace l’illecito nella società, non nel fatto che non vi sia rimedio alla corsa carri eristica, alle incompetenze coperte da simpatie), dall’altra perché attrae quanti sono affascinati dal soldo facile e dal suo tenore di vita. Dall’altra, abbiamo una miriade di oppositori accaniti che sono così tanto sicuri della forza delle loro tesi che in 20 anni non hanno saputo tirare fuori un soggetto da riuscire a contrapporre in modo credibile. Oppositori che lo vivono come un trauma (tra loro, alcuni che vorrebbero essere lui ma who know how to be incapable of changing the resentment and hatred), but that really should thank him for speaking out against him since the mask does not know about the other, that if he was not there / when he will, show all their structural deficiencies. But a thought that claims to be born by the 'anti "from" versus "no one should expect more, does not care to be somebody, be something, rather than to deny, harass, denigrate, to rewrite the other that something is good or bad.
These gentlemen, both committed to bring you down, their miserable condition of this if they have not realized yet. That's why Meanwhile he, as if it is not very happy, it continues to resist his place: for the grunts, barks to the furious, the people prefer and always seeks a leader, it is natural or artificial. Berlusconi is not the cancer of democracy, rather than the emblem of the fallacy of this democracy, libertarian and freedom-at the same time.
Stefano Beccard
