CORNER heretic
Stefano Beccard
think beyond ...
Stefano Beccard
think beyond ...
"All of us we went after the story, but I say that the fault is ours: it is clear that people are not serious when he talks about the left or right," Gaber his debut in a song, noting in a goliardico outline what has no meaning to the archaic social and political subdivisions of the membership thought.
It 's absurd to consider the provision of French parliamentarians in the National Assembly in 1789 as a subdivision of a classical modus cogendi of different political parties. And let me say how absurd it is the same fact that there are opposing political camps, as the ruling class should be oriented towards a single spirit, a single country called just great interest, but because it seems impossible to curb the appetites of a party, we must keep horses mad rant inciting even more those who bargained for them, citizens-clients, which should be united under the same banner ideal, united in dealing with everyday problems, not in the direction of the party is more popular, but always toward the center.
There are no problems "right" or "left" or "center", let alone solutions. There are social issues that require a human effort, intellectual ed emotivo, che si muova verso un'unica direzione. Non è possibile soffermarsi troppo sulla discussione, non ha senso difendere questa fase a spada tratta come se si tratti di una grande conquista civile; le discussioni, le idee devono tramutarsi in azione. Pensare quanto serve ed agire di conseguenza, senza troppi artifici mentali, elucubrazioni retoriche; una è la mente, uno è il braccio, ed entrambi rispondono al nome di “popolo”.
Chi si sofferma troppo sulla fase del dibattimento, e chi in esso cerca sempre di tirare la corda verso la propria parte, o è imbecille o palesemente in malafede. Linguaggio che diventa fine a se stesso, la vittoria che si realizza non nel vedere realizzati i propri pensieri ma nell’avere the best words to another. We must have the courage to apply what they blend in mind, this is the way to win and convince. And what you do for a community must be the result of a mixture of spirit and reason. Without spirit, there are decisions too much "convenience", which then often results in particularism. Without reason we go to pander to the human instincts often more ferocious, to choose a path too grateful, "family", so also in favor of particularism. Click
that the details, exceptions are the enrichment of a framework that both the synthesis and the supreme end. Do not allow the defense of themselves to become bitter end the rule, but an opportunity to grasp, where he would take the spirit of social utility. In short, the "different" can be field of confrontation, mutual understanding, not the absolute dictates.
Stefano Beccard
It 's absurd to consider the provision of French parliamentarians in the National Assembly in 1789 as a subdivision of a classical modus cogendi of different political parties. And let me say how absurd it is the same fact that there are opposing political camps, as the ruling class should be oriented towards a single spirit, a single country called just great interest, but because it seems impossible to curb the appetites of a party, we must keep horses mad rant inciting even more those who bargained for them, citizens-clients, which should be united under the same banner ideal, united in dealing with everyday problems, not in the direction of the party is more popular, but always toward the center.
There are no problems "right" or "left" or "center", let alone solutions. There are social issues that require a human effort, intellectual ed emotivo, che si muova verso un'unica direzione. Non è possibile soffermarsi troppo sulla discussione, non ha senso difendere questa fase a spada tratta come se si tratti di una grande conquista civile; le discussioni, le idee devono tramutarsi in azione. Pensare quanto serve ed agire di conseguenza, senza troppi artifici mentali, elucubrazioni retoriche; una è la mente, uno è il braccio, ed entrambi rispondono al nome di “popolo”.
Chi si sofferma troppo sulla fase del dibattimento, e chi in esso cerca sempre di tirare la corda verso la propria parte, o è imbecille o palesemente in malafede. Linguaggio che diventa fine a se stesso, la vittoria che si realizza non nel vedere realizzati i propri pensieri ma nell’avere the best words to another. We must have the courage to apply what they blend in mind, this is the way to win and convince. And what you do for a community must be the result of a mixture of spirit and reason. Without spirit, there are decisions too much "convenience", which then often results in particularism. Without reason we go to pander to the human instincts often more ferocious, to choose a path too grateful, "family", so also in favor of particularism. Click
that the details, exceptions are the enrichment of a framework that both the synthesis and the supreme end. Do not allow the defense of themselves to become bitter end the rule, but an opportunity to grasp, where he would take the spirit of social utility. In short, the "different" can be field of confrontation, mutual understanding, not the absolute dictates.
Stefano Beccard
0 comments:
Post a Comment