Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Hooking Up With Herpes
LA REGIONE LAZIO CENSURA SITI PORNOGRAFICI: DA QUANDO “GAY” E’ DIVENTATO SINONIMO DI “PORNOGRAFIA”?
" And these people want to know if you are heterosexual, homosexual or not you care? In life, certain differences can not count. Reject homophobia, not what you different. " This is the advertisement sponsored by the Ministry for Equal Opportunities, broadcast on national network. Perhaps Lazio could not remember when he decided to obscure some of the major news sites gay Italians, who were classified as "pornographic ": from a gay.it gay.tv up to gaynews. com. "Access denied". Reason: "The current corporate policies do not allow access to the requested site. The page you are trying to view is categorized as Pornography. "This appeared on the screen Sergio Rovasio (Certain Rights and secretary of the radical leader answering the Bonino List Pannella European Federalists and the Lazio Region) when he tried to access a of those sites. They offer room for discussions through chat and forums, part of which are published for any news letters you wish to tell. "After closing (and reopening) in the last 48 hours, access to dozens of news sites and social networking, now is the time of those that give information on glbt community-Italian Strongly denounces Rovasio-portals that publish often radical initiatives of the Lazio regional council, for example on civil unions and to fight discrimination. "inevitable reactions of stakeholders, who consider the measure a true regional operation of its complaint. Alessio De Giorgi, director of Gay.it Is not at all surprised or beyond related events, most recently because he had witnessed the closure of access to social networks, then restored to heated protests. accessing these sites and also giving a glimpse of what is published there, the impression one gets is that of a common blog for information open to anyone wishing to contribute , a blog where are also reported episodes unpleasant and offensive to human dignity which is often much more comfortable not to mention the degree of indecency of such vehicles are actually pages specifically related to aspects of sexuality but still treated to contain, and without vulgarity. It is natural to ask whether this Puto that complaint will affect the content or nature of these sites, with a nomenclature annoying? Strong statement but want to emphasize inherent prejudice and a consequent discriminatory attitude that invariably arise. Could also be moved to the opposite criticism: that happens in most occasions are deemed a discriminatory approach even when there is. Yet how to define this explicit disapproval of half computer that is nothing but a press release where the topics cover a phenomenon more than ever current, more controversial than ever? Freedom of expression is also this, to give voice to all those who want to express despite having different ideas. What has been harmed in this case? The decor? Fairness? Or the sensibilities of some?
Federica Cappellini
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment